Show All » 2008 » Recent
Monday, January 12, 2009Winter Now, Spring Getting Closer
Top.
Show All » 2008 » Recent
Monday, December 22, 2008Now that's good news!
Top.
Show All » 2008 » Recent
Thursday, November 27, 2008Just the Facts Man!
![]() |
Here are a few Lake Ontario factoids. This treasure of a lake is 193 miles long, 53 miles wide, and has 712 miles of shoreline. The lakes average depth is 283 feet, with the deepest depth, way, way down at 802 feet. The lake has 7340 miles of surface area and a water retention/ replacement time of 6 years. Its drainage basin area is 23,400 square miles. Safe to say it is a large body of water, even though it is the smallest Great Lake. |
|
We all are well aware of the wonderful world class fishery dominated by huge king salmon and trout that exists within its waters. We may not all be aware that this action packed fishery is totally dependent on the smallest of creatures, some visible only under magnification of a microscope. Without this assortment of critters, great catching would not be possible. The food chain puzzle is certainly complex and ever changing. It all starts with phytoplankton, (algae), which gets eaten by zooplankton, which gets eaten by small fish such as alewives, which in turn is eaten by salmon and trout which then gets consumed by a big time predator known as a human. Starting with the phytoplankton population, nurtured by the sun fueled photosynthesis process; the nutrient energy capability of the lake is an ever evolving, tumultuous, biological adventure. Thats why some years produce bigger fish than others. Like the NYS Lottery guy says, "hey you never know." The completion of the St Lawrence Seaway shipping channels and gigantic lock system really changed things throughout the Great Lakes by knowingly providing an entry channel for hundreds of foreign species to our waters. Zebra and Quagga Mussels, ruffe, , gobies, spiny water fleas and fish hook water fleas are a few of the recent relocated residents previously found in Eastern European waters. So far the lake has adapted and survived the invasion but school is out regarding long term consequences. We can only hope that the lakes resiliency powers will allow it to prevail. As governments, lobbied by the shipping industry, move toward exotic invader elimination through ballast water control at the speed of a one legged turtle, our best hope is the lakes ability to adjust on its own. So far so good, however, what new invader is currently lurking at the doorstep of the worlds largest freshwater system? Well how about the recent arrival, Mr. Hemimysis Anomala, nicknamed the Bloody Red Shrimp. Check out www.glerl.noaa.gov/hemimysis Found recently off Oswego NY, the creature about 1/2 in length is now believed to have been around for a couple of years. We are not yet certain of the shrimps long term impact; however, biologists believe the recent larger alewife size may be a result of their consumption of the newly arrived amphipod. What nature taketh away it sometimes givith back, as it appears that the shrimp are being gobbled up by opportunistic alewives. Fatter baitfish means larger salmon and trout. Perhaps this will be a good invadermaybe. I hope. Only time will tell. Speaking of time, yours truly, a hungry predator, is about to chomp on some turkey leftovers. It is still great to be a Lake Ontario Troller, especially around Thanksgiving time. | |
|
| |
Top.
Show All » 2008 » Recent
Friday, November 14, 2008We're baaaack!!!!
Top.
Show All » 2008 » Recent
Friday, August 01, 2008Competitive Fishing
Top.
Show All » 2008 » Recent
Thursday, June 19, 2008Careful -- You may get what you wish for...
![]() |
As a long time advocate of the Lake Ontario Trout and Salmon Fishery, I have encountered all types of people with all types of agendas and certainly all types of opinions. For the most part, these participants help to insure the continued success of Lake Ontario fishing. If you look into its history you will find years and years of fine fishing be it for recreational or charter endeavors. |
|
Now that we know that the Salmon River and possibly other tributaries as well, are producing some naturally spawned Chinook fry, the closet door opens and out come the purist of the pure agenda driven lurkers. Im talking about anglers who want the lake returned to the days of wild fish only populations with an emphasis on native species only. It is a desire to return to the way it was probably because it creates a feel good sensation. For me, returning to the way it was centuries ago is not necessarily a good thing. I am told that way back when, if you caught a cold you probably died. Thank the Almighty for amoxicillin. For me it is go forward, not backwards. I guess it is another seemingly trendy feeling that a few know what is best for many. It reminds me of our elected senator and house reps. who look at us with condescending stares and tell us that they and only they know what is best. Then they set about doing almost nothing except pander to the focus group of the day. If we choose the wild fish only approach we will quickly return to boom or bust fishing scenarios with good years sometimes followed by sparse years. Yet many wild only advocates will feel good about their noble efforts. I for one will not feel good. Managing the fishery with a dual approach of stocked and wild fish would seem to be the best policy to follow and over thirty years of effort has proved to be extremely successful. Lets use the wild fish population to augment the stocking approach, that way we can better keep the fishery on a more level population pattern. Keep in mind that while we know some wild fish are surviving in the Salmon River, we really do not know how many, if any, reach adulthood out in the open lake waters. The tiny wild creatures born in the river face a treacherous down stream migration to the open lake and then must swim through a huge water gauntlet filled with numerous predators, who of course, view them as a tasty meal. Until we know the answer to the survival question, the verdict is still out on possible wild fish contributions to the salmon population. We will have the answer to this question in two to three years as the new fish tagging system is placed on line. (refer to my previous blog dated May 31st) Only time will tell. In my opinion, even with proven wild fish survival we should continue to manage the fishery using the dual approach of stocking fish in sync with scientifically determined wild fish contributions. If we do that, it will always be great to be a Lake Ontario troller. | |
|
| |
Top.
Show All » 2008 » Recent
Saturday, May 31, 2008Tools of the Trade -- Automated Fish Tagging System
|
Excellent Lake Ontario Fishing provides fantastic fun filled opportunity for thousands of piscatorial enthusiasts. Lake Ontario Fishing is recognized for its world class status but the fishery just didn't happen by chance. It happened because of a commitment by the NYS Bureau of Fisheries to create, institute, manage, and continually adjust policies to provide quality fishing prospects. You can learn more about the program by reading an article I wrote |
|
several years ago that chronicles the history of the fishery. click here to read the article titled "Good Science or Good Luck, the Great Lake Ontario Fishery". Recently the Bureau of Fisheries purchased a state of the art mobile fish tagging system that is going to provide needed data that takes the guess work out of the fish population make up as it exists now and into the future. Today, if you ask how many wild fish are in the population mix, no one knows. If you ask how many of the Salmon River stocked fish show up in other areas, no one knows. In a couple of years we will know the answers to these questions, and with a very high degree of accuracy. The higher the degree of accuracy used in scientific modeling the more dependable the data and consequently the resulting decisions. In essence this addition to the biologists arsenal is going to result in a better fishing future for the big lake. For more details on the system visit AutoFish System and see it in action here AutoFish Videos. | |
|
This amazing system can automatically fin clip and/or install coded wire nose tags at an incredible rate of nearly 60,000 fish in an 8 hour period and required manpower is minimal. The system was used this past year (2008) to clip the adipose fin of all stocked chinooks.In addition all kings stocked in the Salmon River received a coded wire tag in their snout. In a few years we will be able to determine the wild to stocked fish population ratio. By the way, the system |
|
was used to mark Canadian stocked kings as well, meaning that the entire lake has been covered. Empirical scientific data is on its way. | |
Top.
Show All » 2008 » Recent
Thursday, May 08, 2008Lake Ontario Net Pens -- An Oswego NY Success Story...
|
The world class fishery that exists in the waters of |
|
I believe that three things have led to The Oswego NY Lake Ontario Net Pens project is the result of hard work by a reliable few. The results of their contributions benefit all who use the fishery. Building the pens, maintaining them, feeding the fish housed in the pens, cleaning the pens, monitoring fish condition and growth, releasing the fish at the proper time, removing the pens from the water, cleaning the pens and storing them, then repeating the process year after year. It is this effort by quality volunteers that has made a huge difference in fishing success. The scientists call it catch per unit of effort. Once the fish are stocked, the forces of nature always prevail; however, it does help when those critters to be placed into the wild get a head start. That what the pens do. | |
|
Fishing organizations such as the Eastern Lake Ontario Salmon and Trout Association, www.elosta.org certainly finds many volunteers as their members. It is ELOSTA that keeps net pen donation funds and pays the bills for the effort. They provide a great service. The Oswego Port Authority provides space for pen storage and the Oswego Pro Am and Mustad Challenge provides venues for collection pen maintenance donations. |
|
It is really quite interesting to see just how great the system works. If you would like to donate to the pen project fund, check out Tom Allens trolling fly web site, for the net pen board game click here.Tom is donating a copper rod and reel setup valued at $350.00 with proceeds from a 100 square big board going to the pen fund. Tom is not only one of our volunteers, he continues to be a huge help in raising needed funds. | |
Top.
Show All » 2008 » Recent
Monday, April 21, 2008Catch and Release, do it right !
In todays angling world, the philosophy and practice of catching a fish and then releasing it to hopefully live and fight another day is as popular as good ole Oprah and the Double Whopper. It is simply the in thing to do. While I agree that catch and release is a fine idea, I am not in tune with those who seem to have elevated the practice to some sort of mystical, uplifting experience. Some even have the audacity to say that you are not a true sportsman until you become a follower or should I say a releaser. To this I say baloney, bull dung, and horse poop.
Catch and release is an acceptable practice and so is catch, keep, and eat, especially when utilizing a put, grow, and take fishery such as that on Lake Ontario. The heart healthy practice of eating fish is plain and simply good for you. It is equally okay to adhere to the catch and release philosophy, provided proper release methods are employed. Believe me when I tell you that release procedures are crucial to catch and release mortality reduction. Oh yeah folks, be advised that many released fish die, perhaps we feel great when we see the fish swim away but in some cases that fish dies several hours after its release.
On our Lake Ontario charter boat the Dixie Dandy, I discuss this topic with my clients prior to the start of fishing for the day. I explain that if they are going to eat the fish they are legally entitled to keep their limit. On the other hand if they wish to release their fish we are happy to comply. We suggest that perhaps a mixture of the two practices might be best. Keep a few and release a few. On the keep side we suggest keeping the smaller fish for table fare, and of course they can keep a trophy. On the release side we explain that in order to maximize release survival we need to land the fish quickly, release the fish while it is still in the water if possible, no netting and please no posed photos. Heres why: The longer it takes to land a fish increases the build up of lactic acid which can have serious negative results when it comes to release survival with the odds for mortality further increasing the longer the fish is out of the water. Hence, no posed photos such as that often used pose of the dude angler, holding his rod between his teeth and displaying his catch. It is better to take an action photo such as just before landing the critter. Goggle catch and release and you will see that almost every article promoting C and R stresses this. There is a paradox here as many anglers favor light tackle which results in a longer stress filled fight and the likelihood of high acid buildup. Experts recommend use of heavier tackle to land the fish quickly.
One more point, since there is a degree of mortality associated with catch and release the more you catch to be released the greater the mortality rate becomes. If you catch 30 and release 30 you are almost certainly killing some. Perhaps it would be better to adhere to standard limit regulations whether you are keeping them or releasing them. This might be tough to police, however, from what I hear from catch and release disciples they would police themselves. Ya think?
In any event, I totally agree that both choices are ok and on the Dixie Dandy the choice is up to my customers with a little bit of advice from the Captain. Remember this, whatever method you choose, you are a sportsman and don't let anyone tell you different!
Posted By: Capn Gerry Bresadola @ 9:37:29 PMTop.
Show All » 2008 » Recent
Tuesday, April 01, 2008Catch'em n Eat'em, why not ?
![]() |
In our politically correct world it is easy to define many causes that generally result in a divided populace. Look at Al Gore's global warming crusade and you find those that claim the sky is falling or should I say warming and those who offer scientific evidence to the contrary, although that evidence is often hard to find unless you really look for it. Thank the Almighty for the internet, or should I thank Al instead. Scientists on both sides of the issue lay claim to being right, thus one needs to look at all the facts, not just those that may be the politically correct soup du jour. |
Is earth really warming due to the negative influence of mankind, you bet says Al Gore and his minions, no way Hose' say plenty of credible weather climate scientists including the founder of the Weather Channel. Should we drill in Anwar, no says Al and the greens, yes say the majority of Alaskans and citizens like myself, especially when I am pumping $3.50 per gallon fuel. Do you not wonder who is right and who is wrong?
As a
One of the most frequent questions I am asked while on my charter fishing boat is, can I eat the fish? Basically, I tell my clients that it is their choice, however I will also try to inform them of some things I have discovered regarding the mercury scare. I will say this; before you bite into a grilled sword fish steak or a tasty king salmon fillet, read on and consider the following:
NYS has published fish consumption warnings based on data which places a great deal of emphasis on mercury levels in fish such as salmon. For years we have been told that mercury ingested into our systems via food might be harmful to our health. What we have not been told is that the guidelines have a huge built-in safeguard level and that current levels in fish such as tuna are well under EPA safety standards. In effect, the EPA has purposely created a huge buffer zone between what they believe would be acceptable exposure and what they actually tell us.
While there are NYS published warnings regarding Lake Ontario fish consumption it now seems that perhaps these advisories are not solely based on science but rather those who follow the activism mantra such as those who are opposed to fishing. The US EPA mercury reference dose is the most restrictive in the world. In fact it is 4.7 times higher than that of the World Health Organization. How come?
I find it interesting that some scientists say that mercury levels have remained the same or even decreased over the last 100 years. A team of researchers from Duke University compared 21 specimens of Atlantic Blue Hake preserved in the 1880s with 66 Hake samples from the 1970s. They found no change at all in the concentration of mercury. In another study conducted by
This site will explain how fish rich in Selenium, such as salmon, diminish even further any concerns about mercury. Studies reveal that eating selenium rich fish and thus gaining the heart healthy benefits of Omega III acids found in fish far outweigh any consequences that some activists say might occur if you eat fish such as salmon. Why does that not surprise me?
The choice is yours. I for one am not concerned about eating
Now that you know you can catch and eat, look for my next blog which talks about catch and release as opposed to catch and keep. I consider the subject another politically correct issue. This will be a good one.
Top.
«« First |
« Previous |
Next » |
Last »» |
Records 11 to 20 of 42 |













